The Beatles ’65 album was issued in the United States and Canada in December 1964, just in time for Christmas. It includes eight of the fourteen songs from Beatles for Sale, supplemented by “I’ll Be Back”, which was omitted from the US version of the previous Hard Day’s Night, plus both sides of the single “I Feel Fine” / “She’s a Woman”.
The typeface used for “Beatles ’65” might be West Ameristile, drawn by Dave West for Photo-Lettering. I don’t have a full specimen to compare against, that’s why I can’t say for sure. With some stretching, one can come close.
A detail from the record cover (top) compared to West Ameristyle, stretched
At least it has a fairly similar S and the right A with legs of different weight. What speaks against Ameristyle is that one would need to apply different amounts of stretching to match the cover typography. Also, the middle bar in E isn’t much shorter than the others. And Ameristyle isn’t shown in Photo-Lettering’s 1965 catalog, suggesting a later date for the design. Anyone who has a better suggestion: we love to hear from you!
Right, the second E has a wider stem. That’s a peculiar detail, no matter whether it started with a typeface or not. I can imagine this intervention was motivated by the desire for a more even color: the E to the right of L asks for more weight to counterbalance the large gap.
It’s always possible that it’s custom lettering, without the involvement of any font.
3 Comments on “The Beatles – Beatles ’65 album art”
Hello Diego, thanks for your submission!
The typeface used for “Beatles ’65” might be West Ameristile, drawn by Dave West for Photo-Lettering. I don’t have a full specimen to compare against, that’s why I can’t say for sure. With some stretching, one can come close.
A detail from the record cover (top) compared to West Ameristyle, stretched
At least it has a fairly similar S and the right A with legs of different weight. What speaks against Ameristyle is that one would need to apply different amounts of stretching to match the cover typography. Also, the middle bar in E isn’t much shorter than the others. And Ameristyle isn’t shown in Photo-Lettering’s 1965 catalog, suggesting a later date for the design. Anyone who has a better suggestion: we love to hear from you!
What’s really odd is that the two Es in “BEATLES” don’t match.
Right, the second E has a wider stem. That’s a peculiar detail, no matter whether it started with a typeface or not. I can imagine this intervention was motivated by the desire for a more even color: the E to the right of L asks for more weight to counterbalance the large gap.
It’s always possible that it’s custom lettering, without the involvement of any font.