The cover of the 1970 Bantam Books edition of Simone de Beauvoir’s groundbreaking work. Title and author are set in Bookman Bold Swash: a clear favourite of the graphic design agencies of the era. The promo copy including summary and blurb are in a different, plainer variant of Bookman Italic.
Swashes abound, drop, clash, and in one case a ball terminal of the swash n in Simone plays the part of the dot in the i of Beauvoir.
Thank you, David! The title is definitely set in a Bookman Italic with swashes. It’s not theBookman Bold Swash as carried by Typeshop, Letraset and others – simply because it’s not bold, and also because some swash forms including for r and x don’t quite match. I don’t pinpoint this specific version – it’s not Bookman Light Italic Agency by Castcraft, and apparenly not neo-Bookman Light Italic by Headlines either. It might be Photo-Lettering’s Bookman Italic Swash Series B, but I don’t have a full sample to compare against. I’ll leave the typeface credit as is, because Bookman Bold Swash is still the closest option.
The smaller text is set in a different Bookman Italic. Not only is it swashless, it also has wider proportions and smaller apertures, compare a or e. That’s why I’ve added standard Bookman to the typeface list as well. The horizontally compact f suggests that this font is (a phototype adaptation of) a version for machine typesetting. It’s not Linotype’s, though – that one has a g with the ear to the right.
1 Comment on “The Second Sex by Simone de Beauvoir (Bantam)”
Thank you, David! The title is definitely set in a Bookman Italic with swashes. It’s not the Bookman Bold Swash as carried by Typeshop, Letraset and others – simply because it’s not bold, and also because some swash forms including for r and x don’t quite match. I don’t pinpoint this specific version – it’s not Bookman Light Italic Agency by Castcraft, and apparenly not neo-Bookman Light Italic by Headlines either. It might be Photo-Lettering’s Bookman Italic Swash Series B, but I don’t have a full sample to compare against. I’ll leave the typeface credit as is, because Bookman Bold Swash is still the closest option.
The smaller text is set in a different Bookman Italic. Not only is it swashless, it also has wider proportions and smaller apertures, compare a or e. That’s why I’ve added standard Bookman to the typeface list as well. The horizontally compact f suggests that this font is (a phototype adaptation of) a version for machine typesetting. It’s not Linotype’s, though – that one has a g with the ear to the right.